android_kernel_motorola_sm6225/arch/x86/include/asm/dmi.h

#ifndef _ASM_X86_DMI_H
#define _ASM_X86_DMI_H

#include <linux/compiler.h>
#include <linux/init.h>

#include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/setup.h>

static __always_inline __init void *dmi_alloc(unsigned len)
{
	return extend_brk(len, sizeof(int));
}

/* Use early IO mappings for DMI because it's initialized early */
#define dmi_ioremap early_ioremap
#define dmi_iounmap early_iounmap

#endif /* _ASM_X86_DMI_H */
x86: Fix ASM_X86__ header guards Change header guards named "ASM_X86__" to "_ASM_X86_" since: a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless. b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> 2008-10-23 07:26:29 +02:00			`#ifndef _ASM_X86_DMI_H`
			`#define _ASM_X86_DMI_H`
x86: unify include/asm/dmi_32/64.h Unification, so we have these things in one file. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> 2007-10-15 23:28:20 +02:00
x86/dmi: fix dmi_alloc() section mismatches Impact: section mismatch fix Ingo reports these warnings: > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x6a288e): Section mismatch in reference from > the function dmi_alloc() to the function .init.text:extend_brk() > The function dmi_alloc() references > the function __init extend_brk(). > This is often because dmi_alloc lacks a __init annotation or the > annotation of extend_brk is wrong. dmi_alloc() is a static inline, and so should be immune to this kind of error. But force it to be inlined and make it __init anyway, just to be extra sure. All of dmi_alloc()'s callers are already __init. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <49C6B23C.2040308@goop.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 2009-03-22 22:48:44 +01:00			`#include <linux/compiler.h>`
			`#include <linux/init.h>`

x86: unify include/asm/dmi_32/64.h Unification, so we have these things in one file. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> 2007-10-15 23:28:20 +02:00			`#include <asm/io.h>`
x86: use brk allocation for DMI Impact: use new interface instead of previous ad hoc implementation Use extend_brk() to allocate memory for DMI rather than having an ad-hoc allocator. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> 2009-02-27 22:35:45 +01:00			`#include <asm/setup.h>`
x86: unify include/asm/dmi_32/64.h Unification, so we have these things in one file. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> 2007-10-15 23:28:20 +02:00
x86/dmi: fix dmi_alloc() section mismatches Impact: section mismatch fix Ingo reports these warnings: > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x6a288e): Section mismatch in reference from > the function dmi_alloc() to the function .init.text:extend_brk() > The function dmi_alloc() references > the function __init extend_brk(). > This is often because dmi_alloc lacks a __init annotation or the > annotation of extend_brk is wrong. dmi_alloc() is a static inline, and so should be immune to this kind of error. But force it to be inlined and make it __init anyway, just to be extra sure. All of dmi_alloc()'s callers are already __init. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <49C6B23C.2040308@goop.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 2009-03-22 22:48:44 +01:00			`static __always_inline __init void *dmi_alloc(unsigned len)`
x86: unify include/asm/dmi_32/64.h Unification, so we have these things in one file. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> 2007-10-15 23:28:20 +02:00			`{`
x86: use brk allocation for DMI Impact: use new interface instead of previous ad hoc implementation Use extend_brk() to allocate memory for DMI rather than having an ad-hoc allocator. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> 2009-02-27 22:35:45 +01:00			`return extend_brk(len, sizeof(int));`
x86: unify include/asm/dmi_32/64.h Unification, so we have these things in one file. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> 2007-10-15 23:28:20 +02:00			`}`

dmi: clean-up dmi helper declarations The declaration of dmi helper functions is a bit messy and inconsistent at the moment: * On ia64 they are declared in <asm/io.h>. * On x86-64 they are declared in <asm/dmi.h>. * On i386 they are declared both in <asm/io.h> and <asm/dmi.h>. Fix the header files so that the dmi helper functions are consistently defined in <asm/dmi.h>. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Cc: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 2008-05-01 13:35:01 +02:00			`/* Use early IO mappings for DMI because it's initialized early */`
x86: unify include/asm/dmi_32/64.h Unification, so we have these things in one file. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> 2007-10-15 23:28:20 +02:00			`#define dmi_ioremap early_ioremap`
			`#define dmi_iounmap early_iounmap`

x86: Fix ASM_X86__ header guards Change header guards named "ASM_X86__" to "_ASM_X86_" since: a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless. b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> 2008-10-23 07:26:29 +02:00			`#endif /* _ASM_X86_DMI_H */`