cpufreq: conservative: Fix comment explaining frequency updates

The original comment about the frequency increase to maximum is wrong.

Both increase and decrease happen at steps.

Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Stratos Karafotis 2016-11-16 21:27:22 +02:00 committed by Rafael J. Wysocki
parent 00bfe05889
commit 42d951c851

View file

@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ static inline unsigned int get_freq_step(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners,
* sampling_down_factor, we check, if current idle time is more than 80%
* (default), then we try to decrease frequency
*
* Any frequency increase takes it to the maximum frequency. Frequency reduction
* happens at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum frequency
* Frequency updates happen at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum
* frequency
*/
static unsigned int cs_dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{