sched/numa: Fix period_slot recalculation

The original code is as intended and was meant to scale the difference
between the NUMA_PERIOD_THRESHOLD and local/remote ratio when adjusting
the scan period. The period_slot recalculation can be dropped.

Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1386833006-6600-4-git-send-email-liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Wanpeng Li 2013-12-12 15:23:26 +08:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 82897b4fd3
commit e777b63bbd

View file

@ -1342,7 +1342,6 @@ static void update_task_scan_period(struct task_struct *p,
* scanning faster if shared accesses dominate as it may
* simply bounce migrations uselessly
*/
period_slot = DIV_ROUND_UP(diff, NUMA_PERIOD_SLOTS);
ratio = DIV_ROUND_UP(private * NUMA_PERIOD_SLOTS, (private + shared));
diff = (diff * ratio) / NUMA_PERIOD_SLOTS;
}