Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dave Jones
9273214409 [PATCH] cpufreq: SMP fix for conservative governor
Don't try to access not-present CPUs.  Conservative governor will always
oops on SMP without this fix.

Fixes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4781

Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-10-27 16:29:24 -07:00
Dave Jones
9c7d269b9b [CPUFREQ] ondemand,conservative governor idle_tick clean-up
[PATCH] [3/5] ondemand,conservative governor idle_tick clean-up

Ondemand and conservative governor clean-up, it factorises the idle ticks 
measurement.

Signed-off-by: Eric Piel <eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net>
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2005-05-31 19:03:49 -07:00
Dave Jones
790d76fa97 [CPUFREQ] ondemand,conservative governor store the idle ticks for all cpus
[PATCH] [2/5] ondemand,conservative governor store the idle ticks for all cpus

Ondemand, conservative governor did not store prev_cpu_idle_up into 
prev_cpu_idle_down for other CPUs than the current CPU.

Signed-off-by: Eric Piel <eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net>
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2005-05-31 19:03:49 -07:00
Dave Jones
dac1c1a562 [CPUFREQ] ondemand,conservative minor bug-fix and cleanup
[PATCH] [1/5] ondemand,conservative minor bug-fix and cleanup

Attached patch fixes some minor issues with Alexander's patch and related
cleanup in both ondemand and conservative governor.

Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2005-05-31 19:03:49 -07:00
Dave Jones
b9170836d1 [CPUFREQ] Conservative cpufreq governer
A new cpufreq module, based on the ondemand one with my additional patches
just posted.  This one is more suitable for battery environments where its
probably more appealing to have the cpu freq gracefully increase and decrease
rather than flip between the min and max freq's.

N.B. Bruno Ducrot pointed out that the amd64's "do have unacceptable latency
between min and max freq transition, due to the step-by-step requirements
(200MHz IIRC)"; so AMD64 users would probably benefit from this too.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Clouter <alex-kernel@digriz.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2005-05-31 19:03:47 -07:00