Affects PM1 Control register only. When reading the register, zero
the write-only bits as per the ACPI spec. ACPICA BZ 443. Lin Ming.
http://www.acpica.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=443
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Protect certain I/O ports from reads/writes. Provides MS
compatibility. New module, hwvalid.c
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
As per the ACPI specification, preserve (read/modify/write) all
bits that are defined as either reserved or ignored (PM control
control registers only.)
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Ignored bits must be preserved according to the ACPI spec.
Usually this means a read/modify/write when writing to the
register. However, for status registers, writing a one means
clear the event. Writing a zero means preserve the event (do not
clear.) This behavior is clarified in the ACPI 4.0 spec, and the
ACPICA code now simply always writes a zero to the ignored bit.
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Added acpi_hw_write_pm1_control. This function writes both of the PM1
control registers (A/B). These registers are different than than
the PM1 A/B status and enable registers in that different values
can be written to the A/B registers. Most notably, the SLP_TYP
bits can be different, as per the values returned from the _Sx
predefined methods.
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The PM1B registers are mirrors of the PM1A registers with
different bits actually implemented. From the ACPI specification:
"Although the bits can be split between the two register blocks
(each register block has a unique pointer within the FADT), the bit
positions are maintained. The register block with unimplemented
bits (that is, those implemented in the other register block)
always returns zeros, and writes have no side effects"
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This function was writing an optional PM1B status register
twice. The existing call to the low-level acpi_hw_register_write
automatically handles a possibly split PM1 A/B register.
ACPICA BZ 751.
http://www.acpica.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=751
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
On read, shift B register bits above the A bits. On write,
shift B bits down to zero before writing the B register. New:
acpi_hw_read_multiple, acpi_hw_write_multiple. These two functions now
transparently handle the (possible) split registers for PM1 Status,
Enable, and Control.
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Add new globals for the PM1 status registers (A/B), similar to the
way the PM1 enable registers are handled. Instead of overloading
the FADT Event Register blocks. This makes the code clearer and
less prone to error.
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
