This reverts commit 6c723d5bd8.
It caused build errors on non-x86 platforms, config file confusion, and
even some boot errors on some x86-64 boxes. All around, not quite ready
for prime-time :(
Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
This moves the pci_bus class device to be a real struct device and at
the same time, place it in the device tree in the correct location.
Note, the old "bridge" symlink is now gone, but this was a non-standard
link and no userspace program used it. If you need to determine the
device that the bus is on, follow the standard device symlink, or walk
up the device tree.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
PCI Express ASPM defines a protocol for PCI Express components in the D0
state to reduce Link power by placing their Links into a low power state
and instructing the other end of the Link to do likewise. This
capability allows hardware-autonomous, dynamic Link power reduction
beyond what is achievable by software-only controlled power management.
However, The device should be configured by software appropriately.
Enabling ASPM will save power, but will introduce device latency.
This patch adds ASPM support in Linux. It introduces a global policy for
ASPM, a sysfs file /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy can control
it. The interface can be used as a boot option too. Currently we have
below setting:
-default, BIOS default setting
-powersave, highest power saving mode, enable all available ASPM
state
and clock power management
-performance, highest performance, disable ASPM and clock power
management
By default, the 'default' policy is used currently.
In my test, power difference between powersave mode and performance mode
is about 1.3w in a system with 3 PCIE links.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
This patch adds pci_stop_bus_device() which stops a PCI device (detach
the driver, remove from the global list and so on) and any children.
This is needed for ACPI based PCI-to-PCI bridge hot-remove, and it will
be also needed for ACPI based PCI root bridge hot-remove.
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: MUNEDA Takahiro <muneda.takahiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
pci_walk_bus has a race with pci_destroy_dev. When cb is called
in pci_walk_bus, pci_destroy_dev might unlink the dev pointed by next.
Later on in the next loop, pointer next becomes NULL and cause
kernel panic.
Below patch against 2.6.17-rc4 fixes it by changing pci_bus_lock (spin_lock)
to pci_bus_sem (rw_semaphore).
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanmin <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
This patch contains the following cleanups:
- hotplug/pciehp_core.c: make the needlessly global hpdriver_context
static
- #if 0 the following unused functions:
- pci.c: pci_bus_max_busnr()
- pci.c: pci_max_busnr()
- proc.c: pci_proc_attach_bus()
- remove.c: pci_remove_device_safe
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
When a root bridge hierarchy is hot-plugged, resource requirements for the new
devices may be greater than what the root bridge is decoding. In this case,
we want to remove devices that did not get needed resources. These devices
have been scanned into bus specific lists but not yet added to the global
device list. Make sure the pci remove functions can handle this case.
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
