[Net] Simplify IP resolution code, fix caching.
First, we should not insert into cache if the hostname resolution has failed (as it might be a temporary internet issue), second, the async resolver should also properly insert into cache. Took the chance to remove some duplicate code with critical section in it at the cost of little performance when calling the blocking resolve_hostname function.
This commit is contained in:
parent
252ec22ff9
commit
49297d937c
2 changed files with 13 additions and 31 deletions
|
@ -98,6 +98,11 @@ struct _IP_ResolverPrivate {
|
|||
if (queue[i].status.get() != IP::RESOLVER_STATUS_WAITING) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// We might be overriding another result, but we don't care as long as the result is valid.
|
||||
if (response.size()) {
|
||||
String key = get_cache_key(hostname, type);
|
||||
cache[key] = response;
|
||||
}
|
||||
queue[i].response = response;
|
||||
queue[i].status.set(response.is_empty() ? IP::RESOLVER_STATUS_ERROR : IP::RESOLVER_STATUS_DONE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -120,30 +125,8 @@ struct _IP_ResolverPrivate {
|
|||
};
|
||||
|
||||
IPAddress IP::resolve_hostname(const String &p_hostname, IP::Type p_type) {
|
||||
List<IPAddress> res;
|
||||
String key = _IP_ResolverPrivate::get_cache_key(p_hostname, p_type);
|
||||
|
||||
resolver->mutex.lock();
|
||||
if (resolver->cache.has(key)) {
|
||||
res = resolver->cache[key];
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// This should be run unlocked so the resolver thread can keep
|
||||
// resolving other requests.
|
||||
resolver->mutex.unlock();
|
||||
_resolve_hostname(res, p_hostname, p_type);
|
||||
resolver->mutex.lock();
|
||||
// We might be overriding another result, but we don't care (they are the
|
||||
// same hostname).
|
||||
resolver->cache[key] = res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
resolver->mutex.unlock();
|
||||
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < res.size(); ++i) {
|
||||
if (res[i].is_valid()) {
|
||||
return res[i];
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return IPAddress();
|
||||
const Array addresses = resolve_hostname_addresses(p_hostname, p_type);
|
||||
return addresses.size() ? addresses[0].operator IPAddress() : IPAddress();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Array IP::resolve_hostname_addresses(const String &p_hostname, Type p_type) {
|
||||
|
@ -159,17 +142,16 @@ Array IP::resolve_hostname_addresses(const String &p_hostname, Type p_type) {
|
|||
resolver->mutex.unlock();
|
||||
_resolve_hostname(res, p_hostname, p_type);
|
||||
resolver->mutex.lock();
|
||||
// We might be overriding another result, but we don't care (they are the
|
||||
// same hostname).
|
||||
resolver->cache[key] = res;
|
||||
// We might be overriding another result, but we don't care as long as the result is valid.
|
||||
if (res.size()) {
|
||||
resolver->cache[key] = res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
resolver->mutex.unlock();
|
||||
|
||||
Array result;
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < res.size(); ++i) {
|
||||
if (res[i].is_valid()) {
|
||||
result.push_back(String(res[i]));
|
||||
}
|
||||
result.push_back(String(res[i]));
|
||||
}
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ void IPUnix::_resolve_hostname(List<IPAddress> &r_addresses, const String &p_hos
|
|||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
IPAddress ip = _sockaddr2ip(next->ai_addr);
|
||||
if (!r_addresses.find(ip)) {
|
||||
if (ip.is_valid() && !r_addresses.find(ip)) {
|
||||
r_addresses.push_back(ip);
|
||||
}
|
||||
next = next->ai_next;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue