Merge pull request #45251 from lawnjelly/bvh_fix_pairing

Fix BVH set_pairable and masks.
This commit is contained in:
Rémi Verschelde 2021-01-17 20:24:48 +01:00 committed by GitHub
commit 694e51d210
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
3 changed files with 47 additions and 5 deletions

View file

@ -37,6 +37,15 @@
// However BVH also adds facilities for pairing, to maintain compatibility with Godot 3.2.
// Pairing is a collision pairing system, on top of the basic BVH.
// Some notes on the use of BVH / Octree from Godot 3.2.
// This is not well explained elsewhere.
// The rendering tree mask and types that are sent to the BVH are NOT layer masks.
// They are INSTANCE_TYPES (defined in visual_server.h), e.g. MESH, MULTIMESH, PARTICLES etc.
// Thus the lights do no cull by layer mask in the BVH.
// Layer masks are implemented in the renderers as a later step, and light_cull_mask appears to be
// implemented in GLES3 but not GLES2. Layer masks are not yet implemented for directional lights.
#include "bvh_tree.h"
#define BVHTREE_CLASS BVH_Tree<T, 2, MAX_ITEMS, USE_PAIRS>
@ -168,8 +177,22 @@ public:
// prefer calling this directly as type safe
void set_pairable(const BVHHandle &p_handle, bool p_pairable, uint32_t p_pairable_type, uint32_t p_pairable_mask) {
// unpair callback if already paired? NYI
tree.item_set_pairable(p_handle, p_pairable, p_pairable_type, p_pairable_mask);
if (USE_PAIRS) {
// when the pairable state changes, we need to force a collision check because newly pairable
// items may be in collision, and unpairable items might move out of collision.
// We cannot depend on waiting for the next update, because that may come much later.
AABB aabb;
item_get_AABB(p_handle, aabb);
// passing false disables the optimization which prevents collision checks if
// the aabb hasn't changed
_add_changed_item(p_handle, aabb, false);
// force an immediate collision check (probably just for this one item)
_check_for_collisions();
}
}
// cull tests
@ -181,6 +204,7 @@ public:
params.result_array = p_result_array;
params.subindex_array = p_subindex_array;
params.mask = p_mask;
params.pairable_type = 0;
params.test_pairable_only = false;
params.abb.from(p_aabb);
@ -197,6 +221,7 @@ public:
params.result_array = p_result_array;
params.subindex_array = p_subindex_array;
params.mask = p_mask;
params.pairable_type = 0;
params.segment.from = p_from;
params.segment.to = p_to;
@ -214,6 +239,7 @@ public:
params.result_array = p_result_array;
params.subindex_array = p_subindex_array;
params.mask = p_mask;
params.pairable_type = 0;
params.point = p_point;
@ -235,6 +261,7 @@ public:
params.result_array = p_result_array;
params.subindex_array = nullptr;
params.mask = p_mask;
params.pairable_type = 0;
params.hull.planes = &p_convex[0];
params.hull.num_planes = p_convex.size();
@ -258,6 +285,7 @@ private:
params.result_array = nullptr;
params.subindex_array = nullptr;
params.mask = 0xFFFFFFFF;
params.pairable_type = 0;
for (unsigned int n = 0; n < changed_items.size(); n++) {
const BVHHandle &h = changed_items[n];
@ -435,7 +463,7 @@ private:
_tick++;
}
void _add_changed_item(BVHHandle p_handle, const AABB &aabb) {
void _add_changed_item(BVHHandle p_handle, const AABB &aabb, bool p_check_aabb = true) {
// only if uses pairing
// no .. non pairable items seem to be able to pair with pairable
@ -443,7 +471,11 @@ private:
// aabb check with expanded aabb. This greatly decreases processing
// at the cost of slightly less accurate pairing checks
AABB &expanded_aabb = tree._pairs[p_handle.id()].expanded_aabb;
if (expanded_aabb.encloses(aabb))
// passing p_check_aabb false disables the optimization which prevents collision checks if
// the aabb hasn't changed. This is needed where set_pairable has been called, but the position
// has not changed.
if (p_check_aabb && expanded_aabb.encloses(aabb))
return;
uint32_t &last_updated_tick = tree._extra[p_handle.id()].last_updated_tick;

View file

@ -8,7 +8,10 @@ struct CullParams {
int result_max;
T **result_array;
int *subindex_array;
// nobody truly understands how masks are intended to work.
uint32_t mask;
uint32_t pairable_type;
// optional components for different tests
Vector3 point;
@ -138,8 +141,14 @@ void _cull_hit(uint32_t p_ref_id, CullParams &p) {
if (USE_PAIRS) {
const ItemExtra &ex = _extra[p_ref_id];
if (!(p.mask & ex.pairable_type))
return;
// double check this as a possible source of bugs in future.
bool from_match_to = p.mask & ex.pairable_type;
if (!from_match_to) {
bool to_match_from = ex.pairable_mask & p.pairable_type;
if (!to_match_from)
return;
}
}
_cull_hits.push_back(p_ref_id);

View file

@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ void item_fill_cullparams(BVHHandle p_handle, CullParams &r_params) const {
// we take into account the mask of the item testing from
r_params.mask = extra.pairable_mask;
r_params.pairable_type = extra.pairable_type;
}
bool item_is_pairable(const BVHHandle &p_handle) {