Style: Keep long lines for now
clang-format does not play well with tab-aligned multiline statements... Some more research will be needed if we want to set a column limit.
This commit is contained in:
parent
40323407df
commit
e2a3f06f3d
1 changed files with 11 additions and 22 deletions
|
@ -592,24 +592,17 @@ uint64_t _OS::get_unix_time_from_datetime(Dictionary datetime) const {
|
|||
static const unsigned int SECONDS_PER_MINUTE = 60;
|
||||
static const unsigned int MINUTES_PER_HOUR = 60;
|
||||
static const unsigned int HOURS_PER_DAY = 24;
|
||||
static const unsigned int SECONDS_PER_HOUR = MINUTES_PER_HOUR *
|
||||
SECONDS_PER_MINUTE;
|
||||
static const unsigned int SECONDS_PER_HOUR = MINUTES_PER_HOUR * SECONDS_PER_MINUTE;
|
||||
static const unsigned int SECONDS_PER_DAY = SECONDS_PER_HOUR * HOURS_PER_DAY;
|
||||
|
||||
// Get all time values from the dictionary, set to zero if it doesn't exist.
|
||||
// Risk incorrect calculation over throwing errors
|
||||
unsigned int second = ((datetime.has(SECOND_KEY))?
|
||||
static_cast<unsigned int>(datetime[SECOND_KEY]): 0);
|
||||
unsigned int minute = ((datetime.has(MINUTE_KEY))?
|
||||
static_cast<unsigned int>(datetime[MINUTE_KEY]): 0);
|
||||
unsigned int hour = ((datetime.has(HOUR_KEY))?
|
||||
static_cast<unsigned int>(datetime[HOUR_KEY]): 0);
|
||||
unsigned int day = ((datetime.has(DAY_KEY))?
|
||||
static_cast<unsigned int>(datetime[DAY_KEY]): 0);
|
||||
unsigned int month = ((datetime.has(MONTH_KEY))?
|
||||
static_cast<unsigned int>(datetime[MONTH_KEY]) -1: 0);
|
||||
unsigned int year = ((datetime.has(YEAR_KEY))?
|
||||
static_cast<unsigned int>(datetime[YEAR_KEY]):0);
|
||||
unsigned int second = ((datetime.has(SECOND_KEY)) ? static_cast<unsigned int>(datetime[SECOND_KEY]): 0);
|
||||
unsigned int minute = ((datetime.has(MINUTE_KEY)) ? static_cast<unsigned int>(datetime[MINUTE_KEY]): 0);
|
||||
unsigned int hour = ((datetime.has(HOUR_KEY)) ? static_cast<unsigned int>(datetime[HOUR_KEY]): 0);
|
||||
unsigned int day = ((datetime.has(DAY_KEY)) ? static_cast<unsigned int>(datetime[DAY_KEY]): 0);
|
||||
unsigned int month = ((datetime.has(MONTH_KEY)) ? static_cast<unsigned int>(datetime[MONTH_KEY]) -1: 0);
|
||||
unsigned int year = ((datetime.has(YEAR_KEY)) ? static_cast<unsigned int>(datetime[YEAR_KEY]):0);
|
||||
|
||||
/// How many days come before each month (0-12)
|
||||
static const unsigned short int DAYS_PAST_THIS_YEAR_TABLE[2][13] = {
|
||||
|
@ -632,19 +625,16 @@ uint64_t _OS::get_unix_time_from_datetime(Dictionary datetime) const {
|
|||
ERR_FAIL_COND_V( month+1 > 12, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
// Do this check after month is tested as valid
|
||||
ERR_EXPLAIN("Invalid day value of: " + itos(day) + " which is larger "
|
||||
"than "+ itos(MONTH_DAYS_TABLE[LEAPYEAR(year)][month]));
|
||||
ERR_EXPLAIN("Invalid day value of: " + itos(day) + " which is larger than "+ itos(MONTH_DAYS_TABLE[LEAPYEAR(year)][month]));
|
||||
ERR_FAIL_COND_V( day > MONTH_DAYS_TABLE[LEAPYEAR(year)][month], 0);
|
||||
|
||||
// Calculate all the seconds from months past in this year
|
||||
uint64_t SECONDS_FROM_MONTHS_PAST_THIS_YEAR =
|
||||
DAYS_PAST_THIS_YEAR_TABLE[LEAPYEAR(year)][month] * SECONDS_PER_DAY;
|
||||
uint64_t SECONDS_FROM_MONTHS_PAST_THIS_YEAR = DAYS_PAST_THIS_YEAR_TABLE[LEAPYEAR(year)][month] * SECONDS_PER_DAY;
|
||||
|
||||
uint64_t SECONDS_FROM_YEARS_PAST = 0;
|
||||
for(unsigned int iyear = EPOCH_YR; iyear < year; iyear++) {
|
||||
|
||||
SECONDS_FROM_YEARS_PAST += YEARSIZE(iyear) *
|
||||
SECONDS_PER_DAY;
|
||||
SECONDS_FROM_YEARS_PAST += YEARSIZE(iyear) * SECONDS_PER_DAY;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
uint64_t epoch =
|
||||
|
@ -675,8 +665,7 @@ Dictionary _OS::get_datetime_from_unix_time( uint64_t unix_time_val) const {
|
|||
|
||||
// Just fail if unix time is negative (when interpreted as an int).
|
||||
// This means the user passed in a negative value by accident
|
||||
ERR_EXPLAIN("unix_time_val was really huge!"+ itos(unix_time_val) +
|
||||
" You probably passed in a negative value!");
|
||||
ERR_EXPLAIN("unix_time_val was really huge!"+ itos(unix_time_val) + " You probably passed in a negative value!");
|
||||
ERR_FAIL_COND_V( (int64_t)unix_time_val < 0, Dictionary());
|
||||
|
||||
OS::Date date;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue