Depending on the conditional statements of the 'for' and 'while' loops,
their body may not even execute once. For example:
func a():
var arr = []
for i in arr:
return i
# can be reached, but analysis says cannot
return -1
func b():
var should_loop = false
while should_loop:
return 1
# can be reached, but analysis says cannot
return 0
The parser will complain that the statements after the comment cannot
be reached, but it is clearly possible for our scenario. This is
because the parser falsely assumes that the loop body will always
execute at least once.
Fix the code to remove this assumption for both of those loops.
(cherry picked from commit 7b1423a61e)
A class can't have multiple signals with the same name, but previously users
would not be alerted to a conflict while editing the script where it occurred.
Now a helpful error will appear in the editor during script parsing.
(cherry picked from commit 9e44739324)
Calling _reduce_node_type from GDScriptParser::_parse_block for assert
was using a current class with a scope that didn't include all
functions. Now calling in GDScriptParser::_check_block_types uses the
right class type. We also now check the assert node message. The assert
line was added to the set_errors associated with assert, since before
the error would be reported on the next line
(cherry picked from commit bd081df519)
Now calling _reduce_node_type with debugging enabled to determine
if assert line is safe. Part of doing this required the assert line
to be stored away. Now the AssertNode line is being correctly set.
Newlines are now marked safe always
(cherry picked from commit 8dc8833782)
lookup was always done on top level script instead of advancing to subclass each time.
this commit changes the lookup to always be at last found subclass
Needed because otherwise the certain type operations (such as type
casting) used as a function argument might become unresolved on release,
causing a compilation failure.
Fix#28680
Properly sets the type of the identifier for the local variable
that is stored in the assignment operation. This makes sure that the
compiler is aware of typing for local variables when they are
initialized with the declaration.
Happy new year to the wonderful Godot community!
We're starting a new decade with a well-established, non-profit, free
and open source game engine, and tons of further improvements in the
pipeline from hundreds of contributors.
Godot will keep getting better, and we're looking forward to all the
games that the community will keep developing and releasing with it.
This makes sure that the classes internally represented with an
underscore (_) prefix, such as singletons, are still properly checked
for inheritance in the ClassDB.
There's no need to subtract 1 from the assignment usages because it's
not incremented anywhere else.
Also put back the assignment with operators because they should not
count as usage if the argument is on the left side.
Some situations caused the parser node type to not being update when
trying to resolve the type, returning invalid data and breaking the
parsing when it shouldn't. This patch fix the behavior.
Before this patch, assert() only took the condition to assert on:
assert(item_data)
Now, it can optionally take a string that will be printed upon failure:
assert(item_data, item_name + " has no item data in ItemDatabase")
This makes it easier to immediately see what the issue is by being
able to write informative failure messages.
Thanks to @wiped1 for sharing their patch, upon which this is based.
Closes#17082
If you somehow end up with a Singleton.gd that looks like this:
extends Node
class_name Singleton
func foo():
pass
You will get an error when using it in another file:
extends Node2D
func _init():
# Parser Error: Non-static function "foo" can only be called from an instance.
Singleton.foo()
This error is confusing. This patch ensures that an error on the class_name line will be produced:
Parse Error: The class "Singleton" conflicts with the AutoLoad singleton of the same name, and is therefore redundant. Remove the class_name declaration to fix this error.
Fixes#28187.
Obeyed CLANG format rules
Obeying CLANG format rules attempt 2
Obeying CLANG format rules attempt 3
Clean up
Fixed runaway while loop
Removed int initialization
The last remaining ERR_EXPLAIN call is in FreeType code and makes sense as is
(conditionally defines the error message).
There are a few ERR_EXPLAINC calls for C-strings where String is not included
which can stay as is to avoid adding additional _MSGC macros just for that.
Part of #31244.
It's not necessary, but the vast majority of calls of error macros
do have an ending semicolon, so it's best to be consistent.
Most WARN_DEPRECATED calls did *not* have a semicolon, but there's
no reason for them to be treated differently.
