2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
/**************************************************************************/
/* worker_thread_pool.cpp */
/**************************************************************************/
/* This file is part of: */
/* GODOT ENGINE */
/* https://godotengine.org */
/**************************************************************************/
/* Copyright (c) 2014-present Godot Engine contributors (see AUTHORS.md). */
/* Copyright (c) 2007-2014 Juan Linietsky, Ariel Manzur. */
/* */
/* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining */
/* a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the */
/* "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including */
/* without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, */
/* distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to */
/* permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to */
/* the following conditions: */
/* */
/* The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be */
/* included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. */
/* */
/* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, */
/* EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF */
/* MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. */
/* IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY */
/* CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, */
/* TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE */
/* SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. */
/**************************************************************************/
# include "worker_thread_pool.h"
2023-11-09 12:29:47 +01:00
# include "core/object/script_language.h"
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
# include "core/os/os.h"
2024-07-18 14:54:58 +02:00
# include "core/os/safe_binary_mutex.h"
2023-06-08 11:33:35 +02:00
# include "core/os/thread_safe.h"
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
WorkerThreadPool : : Task * const WorkerThreadPool : : ThreadData : : YIELDING = ( Task * ) 1 ;
2022-07-23 19:12:41 +02:00
void WorkerThreadPool : : Task : : free_template_userdata ( ) {
2023-09-09 16:11:33 +02:00
ERR_FAIL_NULL ( template_userdata ) ;
ERR_FAIL_NULL ( native_func_userdata ) ;
2022-07-23 19:12:41 +02:00
BaseTemplateUserdata * btu = ( BaseTemplateUserdata * ) native_func_userdata ;
memdelete ( btu ) ;
}
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
WorkerThreadPool * WorkerThreadPool : : singleton = nullptr ;
2024-06-19 08:09:59 +02:00
# ifdef THREADS_ENABLED
2024-07-18 14:54:58 +02:00
thread_local WorkerThreadPool : : UnlockableLocks WorkerThreadPool : : unlockable_locks [ MAX_UNLOCKABLE_LOCKS ] ;
2024-06-19 08:09:59 +02:00
# endif
2023-12-29 01:27:17 +01:00
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
void WorkerThreadPool : : _process_task ( Task * p_task ) {
2023-12-01 19:39:09 +01:00
# ifdef THREADS_ENABLED
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
int pool_thread_index = thread_ids [ Thread : : get_caller_id ( ) ] ;
ThreadData & curr_thread = threads [ pool_thread_index ] ;
Task * prev_task = nullptr ; // In case this is recursively called.
2024-06-13 10:14:14 +02:00
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
bool safe_for_nodes_backup = is_current_thread_safe_for_nodes ( ) ;
2024-06-13 10:14:14 +02:00
CallQueue * call_queue_backup = MessageQueue : : get_singleton ( ) ! = MessageQueue : : get_main_singleton ( ) ? MessageQueue : : get_singleton ( ) : nullptr ;
2023-05-17 00:00:45 +02:00
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
{
2024-07-09 18:41:24 +02:00
// Tasks must start with these at default values. They are free to set-and-forget otherwise.
2023-07-03 12:27:57 +02:00
set_current_thread_safe_for_nodes ( false ) ;
2024-07-09 18:41:24 +02:00
MessageQueue : : set_thread_singleton_override ( nullptr ) ;
2023-11-09 12:29:47 +01:00
// Since the WorkerThreadPool is started before the script server,
// its pre-created threads can't have ScriptServer::thread_enter() called on them early.
// Therefore, we do it late at the first opportunity, so in case the task
// about to be run uses scripting, guarantees are held.
2024-04-08 17:37:00 +02:00
task_mutex . lock ( ) ;
2023-11-09 12:29:47 +01:00
if ( ! curr_thread . ready_for_scripting & & ScriptServer : : are_languages_initialized ( ) ) {
2024-04-08 17:37:00 +02:00
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
2023-11-09 12:29:47 +01:00
ScriptServer : : thread_enter ( ) ;
2024-04-08 17:37:00 +02:00
task_mutex . lock ( ) ;
2023-11-09 12:29:47 +01:00
curr_thread . ready_for_scripting = true ;
}
2023-05-17 00:00:45 +02:00
p_task - > pool_thread_index = pool_thread_index ;
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
prev_task = curr_thread . current_task ;
curr_thread . current_task = p_task ;
2024-04-18 19:05:44 +02:00
if ( p_task - > pending_notify_yield_over ) {
curr_thread . yield_is_over = true ;
}
2023-05-17 00:00:45 +02:00
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
}
2023-12-01 19:39:09 +01:00
# endif
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
2024-07-27 15:24:08 +02:00
# ifdef THREADS_ENABLED
bool low_priority = p_task - > low_priority ;
# endif
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
if ( p_task - > group ) {
// Handling a group
bool do_post = false ;
2022-07-23 19:12:41 +02:00
while ( true ) {
uint32_t work_index = p_task - > group - > index . postincrement ( ) ;
if ( work_index > = p_task - > group - > max ) {
break ;
}
if ( p_task - > native_group_func ) {
p_task - > native_group_func ( p_task - > native_func_userdata , work_index ) ;
} else if ( p_task - > template_userdata ) {
p_task - > template_userdata - > callback_indexed ( work_index ) ;
} else {
2023-07-11 16:18:10 +02:00
p_task - > callable . call ( work_index ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
2022-07-23 19:12:41 +02:00
// This is the only way to ensure posting is done when all tasks are really complete.
uint32_t completed_amount = p_task - > group - > completed_index . increment ( ) ;
if ( completed_amount = = p_task - > group - > max ) {
do_post = true ;
}
}
if ( do_post & & p_task - > template_userdata ) {
memdelete ( p_task - > template_userdata ) ; // This is no longer needed at this point, so get rid of it.
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
if ( do_post ) {
p_task - > group - > done_semaphore . post ( ) ;
p_task - > group - > completed . set_to ( true ) ;
}
uint32_t max_users = p_task - > group - > tasks_used + 1 ; // Add 1 because the thread waiting for it is also user. Read before to avoid another thread freeing task after increment.
uint32_t finished_users = p_task - > group - > finished . increment ( ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
if ( finished_users = = max_users ) {
// Get rid of the group, because nobody else is using it.
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
task_mutex . lock ( ) ;
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
group_allocator . free ( p_task - > group ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
}
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
// For groups, tasks get rid of themselves.
task_mutex . lock ( ) ;
task_allocator . free ( p_task ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
} else {
if ( p_task - > native_func ) {
p_task - > native_func ( p_task - > native_func_userdata ) ;
2022-07-23 19:12:41 +02:00
} else if ( p_task - > template_userdata ) {
p_task - > template_userdata - > callback ( ) ;
memdelete ( p_task - > template_userdata ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
} else {
2023-07-11 16:18:10 +02:00
p_task - > callable . call ( ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
2023-05-17 00:00:45 +02:00
task_mutex . lock ( ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
p_task - > completed = true ;
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
p_task - > pool_thread_index = - 1 ;
if ( p_task - > waiting_user ) {
p_task - > done_semaphore . post ( p_task - > waiting_user ) ;
2023-05-17 00:00:45 +02:00
}
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
// Let awaiters know.
for ( uint32_t i = 0 ; i < threads . size ( ) ; i + + ) {
if ( threads [ i ] . awaited_task = = p_task ) {
threads [ i ] . cond_var . notify_one ( ) ;
threads [ i ] . signaled = true ;
}
2023-05-17 00:00:45 +02:00
}
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
2023-12-01 19:39:09 +01:00
# ifdef THREADS_ENABLED
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
{
curr_thread . current_task = prev_task ;
2024-07-27 15:24:08 +02:00
if ( low_priority ) {
2023-05-11 12:24:59 +02:00
low_priority_threads_used - - ;
2023-05-17 00:00:45 +02:00
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
if ( _try_promote_low_priority_task ( ) ) {
if ( prev_task ) { // Otherwise, this thread will catch it.
_notify_threads ( & curr_thread , 1 , 0 ) ;
}
2023-05-17 00:00:45 +02:00
}
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
2023-05-11 12:24:59 +02:00
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
set_current_thread_safe_for_nodes ( safe_for_nodes_backup ) ;
2024-06-13 10:14:14 +02:00
MessageQueue : : set_thread_singleton_override ( call_queue_backup ) ;
2023-12-01 19:39:09 +01:00
# endif
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
void WorkerThreadPool : : _thread_function ( void * p_user ) {
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
ThreadData * thread_data = ( ThreadData * ) p_user ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
while ( true ) {
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
Task * task_to_process = nullptr ;
{
MutexLock lock ( singleton - > task_mutex ) ;
if ( singleton - > exit_threads ) {
return ;
}
thread_data - > signaled = false ;
if ( singleton - > task_queue . first ( ) ) {
task_to_process = singleton - > task_queue . first ( ) - > self ( ) ;
singleton - > task_queue . remove ( singleton - > task_queue . first ( ) ) ;
} else {
thread_data - > cond_var . wait ( lock ) ;
DEV_ASSERT ( singleton - > exit_threads | | thread_data - > signaled ) ;
}
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
if ( task_to_process ) {
singleton - > _process_task ( task_to_process ) ;
}
}
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
void WorkerThreadPool : : _post_tasks_and_unlock ( Task * * p_tasks , uint32_t p_count , bool p_high_priority ) {
2023-02-04 05:41:43 +01:00
// Fall back to processing on the calling thread if there are no worker threads.
// Separated into its own variable to make it easier to extend this logic
// in custom builds.
bool process_on_calling_thread = threads . size ( ) = = 0 ;
if ( process_on_calling_thread ) {
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
for ( uint32_t i = 0 ; i < p_count ; i + + ) {
_process_task ( p_tasks [ i ] ) ;
}
2023-02-04 05:41:43 +01:00
return ;
}
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
uint32_t to_process = 0 ;
uint32_t to_promote = 0 ;
ThreadData * caller_pool_thread = thread_ids . has ( Thread : : get_caller_id ( ) ) ? & threads [ thread_ids [ Thread : : get_caller_id ( ) ] ] : nullptr ;
2023-02-04 05:41:43 +01:00
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
for ( uint32_t i = 0 ; i < p_count ; i + + ) {
p_tasks [ i ] - > low_priority = ! p_high_priority ;
if ( p_high_priority | | low_priority_threads_used < max_low_priority_threads ) {
task_queue . add_last ( & p_tasks [ i ] - > task_elem ) ;
if ( ! p_high_priority ) {
low_priority_threads_used + + ;
}
to_process + + ;
} else {
// Too many threads using low priority, must go to queue.
low_priority_task_queue . add_last ( & p_tasks [ i ] - > task_elem ) ;
to_promote + + ;
2023-02-04 05:41:43 +01:00
}
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
}
_notify_threads ( caller_pool_thread , to_process , to_promote ) ;
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
}
void WorkerThreadPool : : _notify_threads ( const ThreadData * p_current_thread_data , uint32_t p_process_count , uint32_t p_promote_count ) {
uint32_t to_process = p_process_count ;
uint32_t to_promote = p_promote_count ;
// This is where which threads are awaken is decided according to the workload.
// Threads that will anyway have a chance to check the situation and process/promote tasks
// are excluded from being notified. Others will be tried anyway to try to distribute load.
// The current thread, if is a pool thread, is also excluded depending on the promoting/processing
// needs because it will anyway loop again. However, it will contribute to decreasing the count,
// which helps reducing sync traffic.
uint32_t thread_count = threads . size ( ) ;
// First round:
// 1. For processing: notify threads that are not running tasks, to keep the stacks as shallow as possible.
// 2. For promoting: since it's exclusive with processing, we fin threads able to promote low-prio tasks now.
for ( uint32_t i = 0 ;
i < thread_count & & ( to_process | | to_promote ) ;
i + + , notify_index = ( notify_index + 1 ) % thread_count ) {
ThreadData & th = threads [ notify_index ] ;
if ( th . signaled ) {
continue ;
}
if ( th . current_task ) {
// Good thread for promoting low-prio?
if ( to_promote & & th . awaited_task & & th . current_task - > low_priority ) {
if ( likely ( & th ! = p_current_thread_data ) ) {
th . cond_var . notify_one ( ) ;
}
th . signaled = true ;
to_promote - - ;
}
} else {
if ( to_process ) {
if ( likely ( & th ! = p_current_thread_data ) ) {
th . cond_var . notify_one ( ) ;
}
th . signaled = true ;
to_process - - ;
}
}
}
// Second round:
// For processing: if the first round wasn't enough, let's try now with threads processing tasks but currently awaiting.
for ( uint32_t i = 0 ;
i < thread_count & & to_process ;
i + + , notify_index = ( notify_index + 1 ) % thread_count ) {
ThreadData & th = threads [ notify_index ] ;
if ( th . signaled ) {
continue ;
}
if ( th . awaited_task ) {
if ( likely ( & th ! = p_current_thread_data ) ) {
th . cond_var . notify_one ( ) ;
}
th . signaled = true ;
to_process - - ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
}
}
2023-05-17 00:00:45 +02:00
bool WorkerThreadPool : : _try_promote_low_priority_task ( ) {
if ( low_priority_task_queue . first ( ) ) {
Task * low_prio_task = low_priority_task_queue . first ( ) - > self ( ) ;
low_priority_task_queue . remove ( low_priority_task_queue . first ( ) ) ;
task_queue . add_last ( & low_prio_task - > task_elem ) ;
low_priority_threads_used + + ;
return true ;
} else {
return false ;
}
}
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
WorkerThreadPool : : TaskID WorkerThreadPool : : add_native_task ( void ( * p_func ) ( void * ) , void * p_userdata , bool p_high_priority , const String & p_description ) {
2022-07-23 19:12:41 +02:00
return _add_task ( Callable ( ) , p_func , p_userdata , nullptr , p_high_priority , p_description ) ;
}
WorkerThreadPool : : TaskID WorkerThreadPool : : _add_task ( const Callable & p_callable , void ( * p_func ) ( void * ) , void * p_userdata , BaseTemplateUserdata * p_template_userdata , bool p_high_priority , const String & p_description ) {
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
task_mutex . lock ( ) ;
// Get a free task
Task * task = task_allocator . alloc ( ) ;
TaskID id = last_task + + ;
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
task - > self = id ;
2022-07-23 19:12:41 +02:00
task - > callable = p_callable ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
task - > native_func = p_func ;
task - > native_func_userdata = p_userdata ;
task - > description = p_description ;
2022-07-23 19:12:41 +02:00
task - > template_userdata = p_template_userdata ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
tasks . insert ( id , task ) ;
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
_post_tasks_and_unlock ( & task , 1 , p_high_priority ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
return id ;
}
WorkerThreadPool : : TaskID WorkerThreadPool : : add_task ( const Callable & p_action , bool p_high_priority , const String & p_description ) {
2022-07-23 19:12:41 +02:00
return _add_task ( p_action , nullptr , nullptr , nullptr , p_high_priority , p_description ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
bool WorkerThreadPool : : is_task_completed ( TaskID p_task_id ) const {
task_mutex . lock ( ) ;
const Task * const * taskp = tasks . getptr ( p_task_id ) ;
if ( ! taskp ) {
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
ERR_FAIL_V_MSG ( false , " Invalid Task ID " ) ; // Invalid task
}
bool completed = ( * taskp ) - > completed ;
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
return completed ;
}
2023-05-17 00:00:45 +02:00
Error WorkerThreadPool : : wait_for_task_completion ( TaskID p_task_id ) {
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
task_mutex . lock ( ) ;
Task * * taskp = tasks . getptr ( p_task_id ) ;
if ( ! taskp ) {
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
2023-05-17 00:00:45 +02:00
ERR_FAIL_V_MSG ( ERR_INVALID_PARAMETER , " Invalid Task ID " ) ; // Invalid task
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
Task * task = * taskp ;
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
if ( task - > completed ) {
if ( task - > waiting_pool = = 0 & & task - > waiting_user = = 0 ) {
tasks . erase ( p_task_id ) ;
task_allocator . free ( task ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
return OK ;
}
ThreadData * caller_pool_thread = thread_ids . has ( Thread : : get_caller_id ( ) ) ? & threads [ thread_ids [ Thread : : get_caller_id ( ) ] ] : nullptr ;
if ( caller_pool_thread & & p_task_id < = caller_pool_thread - > current_task - > self ) {
// Deadlock prevention:
// When a pool thread wants to wait for an older task, the following situations can happen:
// 1. Awaited task is deep in the stack of the awaiter.
// 2. A group of awaiter threads end up depending on some tasks buried in the stack
// of their worker threads in such a way that progress can't be made.
// Both would entail a deadlock. Some may be handled here in the WorkerThreadPool
// with some extra logic and bookkeeping. However, there would still be unavoidable
// cases of deadlock because of the way waiting threads process outstanding tasks.
// Taking into account there's no feasible solution for every possible case
// with the current design, we just simply reject attempts to await on older tasks,
// with a specific error code that signals the situation so the caller can handle it.
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
return ERR_BUSY ;
}
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
if ( caller_pool_thread ) {
task - > waiting_pool + + ;
} else {
task - > waiting_user + + ;
}
if ( caller_pool_thread ) {
2024-07-15 11:22:39 +02:00
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
_wait_collaboratively ( caller_pool_thread , task ) ;
2024-07-15 11:22:39 +02:00
task_mutex . lock ( ) ;
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
task - > waiting_pool - - ;
if ( task - > waiting_pool = = 0 & & task - > waiting_user = = 0 ) {
tasks . erase ( p_task_id ) ;
task_allocator . free ( task ) ;
}
} else {
2024-07-15 11:22:39 +02:00
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
task - > done_semaphore . wait ( ) ;
task_mutex . lock ( ) ;
task - > waiting_user - - ;
if ( task - > waiting_pool = = 0 & & task - > waiting_user = = 0 ) {
tasks . erase ( p_task_id ) ;
task_allocator . free ( task ) ;
}
}
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
2024-07-15 11:22:39 +02:00
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
return OK ;
}
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
2024-06-19 08:09:59 +02:00
void WorkerThreadPool : : _lock_unlockable_mutexes ( ) {
# ifdef THREADS_ENABLED
2024-07-18 14:54:58 +02:00
for ( uint32_t i = 0 ; i < MAX_UNLOCKABLE_LOCKS ; i + + ) {
if ( unlockable_locks [ i ] . ulock ) {
unlockable_locks [ i ] . ulock - > lock ( ) ;
2024-06-19 08:09:59 +02:00
}
}
# endif
}
void WorkerThreadPool : : _unlock_unlockable_mutexes ( ) {
# ifdef THREADS_ENABLED
2024-07-18 14:54:58 +02:00
for ( uint32_t i = 0 ; i < MAX_UNLOCKABLE_LOCKS ; i + + ) {
if ( unlockable_locks [ i ] . ulock ) {
unlockable_locks [ i ] . ulock - > unlock ( ) ;
2024-06-19 08:09:59 +02:00
}
}
# endif
}
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
void WorkerThreadPool : : _wait_collaboratively ( ThreadData * p_caller_pool_thread , Task * p_task ) {
// Keep processing tasks until the condition to stop waiting is met.
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
# define IS_WAIT_OVER (unlikely(p_task == ThreadData::YIELDING) ? p_caller_pool_thread->yield_is_over : p_task->completed)
2023-05-11 12:24:59 +02:00
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
while ( true ) {
Task * task_to_process = nullptr ;
2024-06-19 08:09:59 +02:00
bool relock_unlockables = false ;
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
{
MutexLock lock ( task_mutex ) ;
bool was_signaled = p_caller_pool_thread - > signaled ;
p_caller_pool_thread - > signaled = false ;
if ( IS_WAIT_OVER ) {
p_caller_pool_thread - > yield_is_over = false ;
if ( ! exit_threads & & was_signaled ) {
// This thread was awaken for some additional reason, but it's about to exit.
// Let's find out what may be pending and forward the requests.
uint32_t to_process = task_queue . first ( ) ? 1 : 0 ;
uint32_t to_promote = p_caller_pool_thread - > current_task - > low_priority & & low_priority_task_queue . first ( ) ? 1 : 0 ;
if ( to_process | | to_promote ) {
// This thread must be left alone since it won't loop again.
p_caller_pool_thread - > signaled = true ;
_notify_threads ( p_caller_pool_thread , to_process , to_promote ) ;
2023-05-17 00:00:45 +02:00
}
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
}
break ;
}
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
if ( ! exit_threads ) {
if ( p_caller_pool_thread - > current_task - > low_priority & & low_priority_task_queue . first ( ) ) {
if ( _try_promote_low_priority_task ( ) ) {
_notify_threads ( p_caller_pool_thread , 1 , 0 ) ;
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
}
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
}
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
if ( singleton - > task_queue . first ( ) ) {
task_to_process = task_queue . first ( ) - > self ( ) ;
task_queue . remove ( task_queue . first ( ) ) ;
}
2023-12-29 01:27:17 +01:00
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
if ( ! task_to_process ) {
p_caller_pool_thread - > awaited_task = p_task ;
2023-12-29 01:27:17 +01:00
2024-06-19 08:09:59 +02:00
_unlock_unlockable_mutexes ( ) ;
relock_unlockables = true ;
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
p_caller_pool_thread - > cond_var . wait ( lock ) ;
2023-05-11 12:24:59 +02:00
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
DEV_ASSERT ( exit_threads | | p_caller_pool_thread - > signaled | | IS_WAIT_OVER ) ;
p_caller_pool_thread - > awaited_task = nullptr ;
}
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
}
2023-05-17 00:00:45 +02:00
}
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
2024-06-19 08:09:59 +02:00
if ( relock_unlockables ) {
_lock_unlockable_mutexes ( ) ;
}
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
if ( task_to_process ) {
_process_task ( task_to_process ) ;
2023-05-17 00:00:45 +02:00
}
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
}
}
void WorkerThreadPool : : yield ( ) {
int th_index = get_thread_index ( ) ;
ERR_FAIL_COND_MSG ( th_index = = - 1 , " This function can only be called from a worker thread. " ) ;
_wait_collaboratively ( & threads [ th_index ] , ThreadData : : YIELDING ) ;
}
void WorkerThreadPool : : notify_yield_over ( TaskID p_task_id ) {
task_mutex . lock ( ) ;
Task * * taskp = tasks . getptr ( p_task_id ) ;
if ( ! taskp ) {
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
ERR_FAIL_MSG ( " Invalid Task ID. " ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
Task * task = * taskp ;
2024-04-18 19:05:44 +02:00
if ( task - > pool_thread_index = = - 1 ) { // Completed or not started yet.
if ( ! task - > completed ) {
// This avoids a race condition where a task is created and yield-over called before it's processed.
task - > pending_notify_yield_over = true ;
}
2024-04-17 18:32:14 +02:00
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
return ;
2024-04-09 17:26:45 +02:00
}
ThreadData & td = threads [ task - > pool_thread_index ] ;
td . yield_is_over = true ;
td . signaled = true ;
td . cond_var . notify_one ( ) ;
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
2022-07-23 19:12:41 +02:00
WorkerThreadPool : : GroupID WorkerThreadPool : : _add_group_task ( const Callable & p_callable , void ( * p_func ) ( void * , uint32_t ) , void * p_userdata , BaseTemplateUserdata * p_template_userdata , int p_elements , int p_tasks , bool p_high_priority , const String & p_description ) {
ERR_FAIL_COND_V ( p_elements < 0 , INVALID_TASK_ID ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
if ( p_tasks < 0 ) {
2023-06-29 19:44:29 +02:00
p_tasks = MAX ( 1u , threads . size ( ) ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
task_mutex . lock ( ) ;
Group * group = group_allocator . alloc ( ) ;
GroupID id = last_task + + ;
group - > max = p_elements ;
group - > self = id ;
2022-07-23 19:12:41 +02:00
Task * * tasks_posted = nullptr ;
if ( p_elements = = 0 ) {
// Should really not call it with zero Elements, but at least it should work.
group - > completed . set_to ( true ) ;
group - > done_semaphore . post ( ) ;
group - > tasks_used = 0 ;
p_tasks = 0 ;
if ( p_template_userdata ) {
memdelete ( p_template_userdata ) ;
}
} else {
group - > tasks_used = p_tasks ;
tasks_posted = ( Task * * ) alloca ( sizeof ( Task * ) * p_tasks ) ;
for ( int i = 0 ; i < p_tasks ; i + + ) {
Task * task = task_allocator . alloc ( ) ;
task - > native_group_func = p_func ;
task - > native_func_userdata = p_userdata ;
task - > description = p_description ;
task - > group = group ;
task - > callable = p_callable ;
task - > template_userdata = p_template_userdata ;
tasks_posted [ i ] = task ;
// No task ID is used.
}
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
2022-07-23 19:12:41 +02:00
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
groups [ id ] = group ;
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
_post_tasks_and_unlock ( tasks_posted , p_tasks , p_high_priority ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
return id ;
}
2022-07-23 19:12:41 +02:00
WorkerThreadPool : : GroupID WorkerThreadPool : : add_native_group_task ( void ( * p_func ) ( void * , uint32_t ) , void * p_userdata , int p_elements , int p_tasks , bool p_high_priority , const String & p_description ) {
return _add_group_task ( Callable ( ) , p_func , p_userdata , nullptr , p_elements , p_tasks , p_high_priority , p_description ) ;
}
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
WorkerThreadPool : : GroupID WorkerThreadPool : : add_group_task ( const Callable & p_action , int p_elements , int p_tasks , bool p_high_priority , const String & p_description ) {
2022-07-23 19:12:41 +02:00
return _add_group_task ( p_action , nullptr , nullptr , nullptr , p_elements , p_tasks , p_high_priority , p_description ) ;
}
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
2022-07-23 19:12:41 +02:00
uint32_t WorkerThreadPool : : get_group_processed_element_count ( GroupID p_group ) const {
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
task_mutex . lock ( ) ;
2022-07-23 19:12:41 +02:00
const Group * const * groupp = groups . getptr ( p_group ) ;
if ( ! groupp ) {
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
ERR_FAIL_V_MSG ( 0 , " Invalid Group ID " ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
2022-07-23 19:12:41 +02:00
uint32_t elements = ( * groupp ) - > completed_index . get ( ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
2022-07-23 19:12:41 +02:00
return elements ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
bool WorkerThreadPool : : is_group_task_completed ( GroupID p_group ) const {
task_mutex . lock ( ) ;
const Group * const * groupp = groups . getptr ( p_group ) ;
if ( ! groupp ) {
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
ERR_FAIL_V_MSG ( false , " Invalid Group ID " ) ;
}
bool completed = ( * groupp ) - > completed . is_set ( ) ;
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
return completed ;
}
void WorkerThreadPool : : wait_for_group_task_completion ( GroupID p_group ) {
2023-12-01 19:39:09 +01:00
# ifdef THREADS_ENABLED
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
task_mutex . lock ( ) ;
Group * * groupp = groups . getptr ( p_group ) ;
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
if ( ! groupp ) {
2024-02-23 20:49:13 +01:00
ERR_FAIL_MSG ( " Invalid Group ID. " ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
{
Group * group = * groupp ;
2023-12-29 01:27:17 +01:00
2024-06-19 08:09:59 +02:00
_unlock_unlockable_mutexes ( ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
group - > done_semaphore . wait ( ) ;
2024-06-19 08:09:59 +02:00
_lock_unlockable_mutexes ( ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
uint32_t max_users = group - > tasks_used + 1 ; // Add 1 because the thread waiting for it is also user. Read before to avoid another thread freeing task after increment.
uint32_t finished_users = group - > finished . increment ( ) ; // fetch happens before inc, so increment later.
if ( finished_users = = max_users ) {
2022-09-30 14:23:36 +02:00
// All tasks using this group are gone (finished before the group), so clear the group too.
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
task_mutex . lock ( ) ;
group_allocator . free ( group ) ;
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
}
}
2022-10-20 18:47:20 +02:00
task_mutex . lock ( ) ; // This mutex is needed when Physics 2D and/or 3D is selected to run on a separate thread.
groups . erase ( p_group ) ;
task_mutex . unlock ( ) ;
2023-12-01 19:39:09 +01:00
# endif
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
2023-05-23 11:05:32 +02:00
int WorkerThreadPool : : get_thread_index ( ) {
Thread : : ID tid = Thread : : get_caller_id ( ) ;
return singleton - > thread_ids . has ( tid ) ? singleton - > thread_ids [ tid ] : - 1 ;
}
2024-07-10 12:53:14 +02:00
WorkerThreadPool : : TaskID WorkerThreadPool : : get_caller_task_id ( ) {
int th_index = get_thread_index ( ) ;
if ( th_index ! = - 1 & & singleton - > threads [ th_index ] . current_task ) {
return singleton - > threads [ th_index ] . current_task - > self ;
} else {
return INVALID_TASK_ID ;
}
}
2024-06-19 08:09:59 +02:00
# ifdef THREADS_ENABLED
2024-07-18 14:54:58 +02:00
uint32_t WorkerThreadPool : : _thread_enter_unlock_allowance_zone ( THREADING_NAMESPACE : : unique_lock < THREADING_NAMESPACE : : mutex > & p_ulock ) {
for ( uint32_t i = 0 ; i < MAX_UNLOCKABLE_LOCKS ; i + + ) {
DEV_ASSERT ( ( bool ) unlockable_locks [ i ] . ulock = = ( bool ) unlockable_locks [ i ] . rc ) ;
if ( unlockable_locks [ i ] . ulock = = & p_ulock ) {
2024-06-19 08:09:59 +02:00
// Already registered in the current thread.
2024-07-18 14:54:58 +02:00
unlockable_locks [ i ] . rc + + ;
return i ;
} else if ( ! unlockable_locks [ i ] . ulock ) {
unlockable_locks [ i ] . ulock = & p_ulock ;
unlockable_locks [ i ] . rc = 1 ;
2024-06-19 08:09:59 +02:00
return i ;
}
}
2024-07-18 14:54:58 +02:00
ERR_FAIL_V_MSG ( UINT32_MAX , " No more unlockable lock slots available. Engine bug. " ) ;
2023-12-29 01:27:17 +01:00
}
2024-06-19 08:09:59 +02:00
void WorkerThreadPool : : thread_exit_unlock_allowance_zone ( uint32_t p_zone_id ) {
2024-07-18 14:54:58 +02:00
DEV_ASSERT ( unlockable_locks [ p_zone_id ] . ulock & & unlockable_locks [ p_zone_id ] . rc ) ;
unlockable_locks [ p_zone_id ] . rc - - ;
if ( unlockable_locks [ p_zone_id ] . rc = = 0 ) {
unlockable_locks [ p_zone_id ] . ulock = nullptr ;
2024-06-19 08:09:59 +02:00
}
}
# endif
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
void WorkerThreadPool : : init ( int p_thread_count , float p_low_priority_task_ratio ) {
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
ERR_FAIL_COND ( threads . size ( ) > 0 ) ;
if ( p_thread_count < 0 ) {
p_thread_count = OS : : get_singleton ( ) - > get_default_thread_pool_size ( ) ;
}
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
max_low_priority_threads = CLAMP ( p_thread_count * p_low_priority_task_ratio , 1 , p_thread_count - 1 ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
threads . resize ( p_thread_count ) ;
for ( uint32_t i = 0 ; i < threads . size ( ) ; i + + ) {
threads [ i ] . index = i ;
threads [ i ] . thread . start ( & WorkerThreadPool : : _thread_function , & threads [ i ] ) ;
thread_ids . insert ( threads [ i ] . thread . get_id ( ) , i ) ;
}
}
void WorkerThreadPool : : finish ( ) {
if ( threads . size ( ) = = 0 ) {
return ;
}
2023-12-28 19:31:28 +01:00
{
MutexLock lock ( task_mutex ) ;
SelfList < Task > * E = low_priority_task_queue . first ( ) ;
while ( E ) {
print_error ( " Task waiting was never re-claimed: " + E - > self ( ) - > description ) ;
E = E - > next ( ) ;
}
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
WorkerThreadPool: Overhaul scheduling and synchronization
This commits rewrites the sync logic in a way that the
`use_system_threads_for_low_priority_tasks` setting, which was added due to
the lack of a cross-platform wait-for-multiple-objects functionality, can be
removed (it's as if it was effectively hardcoded to `false`).
With the new implementation, we have the best of both worlds: threads don't
have to poll, plus no bespoke threads are used.
In addition, regarding deadlock prevention, since not every possible case of
wait-deadlock could be avoided, this commits removes the current best-effort
avoidance mechanisms and keeps only a simple, pessimistic way of detection.
It turns out that the only current user of deadlock prevention, ResourceLoader,
works fine with it and so every possible situation in resource loading is now
properly handled, with no possibilities of deadlocking. There's a comment in
the code with further details.
Lastly, a potential for load tasks never being awaited/disposed is cleared.
2024-01-05 17:39:26 +01:00
{
MutexLock lock ( task_mutex ) ;
exit_threads = true ;
}
for ( ThreadData & data : threads ) {
data . cond_var . notify_one ( ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
2022-12-29 01:24:45 +01:00
for ( ThreadData & data : threads ) {
data . thread . wait_to_finish ( ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
}
2023-12-28 19:31:28 +01:00
{
MutexLock lock ( task_mutex ) ;
for ( KeyValue < TaskID , Task * > & E : tasks ) {
task_allocator . free ( E . value ) ;
}
}
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
threads . clear ( ) ;
}
void WorkerThreadPool : : _bind_methods ( ) {
ClassDB : : bind_method ( D_METHOD ( " add_task " , " action " , " high_priority " , " description " ) , & WorkerThreadPool : : add_task , DEFVAL ( false ) , DEFVAL ( String ( ) ) ) ;
ClassDB : : bind_method ( D_METHOD ( " is_task_completed " , " task_id " ) , & WorkerThreadPool : : is_task_completed ) ;
ClassDB : : bind_method ( D_METHOD ( " wait_for_task_completion " , " task_id " ) , & WorkerThreadPool : : wait_for_task_completion ) ;
ClassDB : : bind_method ( D_METHOD ( " add_group_task " , " action " , " elements " , " tasks_needed " , " high_priority " , " description " ) , & WorkerThreadPool : : add_group_task , DEFVAL ( - 1 ) , DEFVAL ( false ) , DEFVAL ( String ( ) ) ) ;
ClassDB : : bind_method ( D_METHOD ( " is_group_task_completed " , " group_id " ) , & WorkerThreadPool : : is_group_task_completed ) ;
2022-07-23 19:12:41 +02:00
ClassDB : : bind_method ( D_METHOD ( " get_group_processed_element_count " , " group_id " ) , & WorkerThreadPool : : get_group_processed_element_count ) ;
2022-07-18 12:09:19 +02:00
ClassDB : : bind_method ( D_METHOD ( " wait_for_group_task_completion " , " group_id " ) , & WorkerThreadPool : : wait_for_group_task_completion ) ;
}
WorkerThreadPool : : WorkerThreadPool ( ) {
singleton = this ;
}
WorkerThreadPool : : ~ WorkerThreadPool ( ) {
finish ( ) ;
}