Changed the documentation of distance_fade_max_distance and min
to be consistent with the behavior of the code as well as the user
documentation. Also noted the behavior of swapping max_distance and
min_distance (where max_distance < min_distance).
Fixes#36051.
Co-authored-by: Clay John <claynjohn@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 90d1eda90e)
We already removed it from the online docs with #35132.
Currently it can only be "Built-In Types" (Variant types) or "Core"
(everything else), which is of limited use.
We might also want to consider dropping it from `ClassDB` altogether
in Godot 4.0.
- Add some missing descriptions.
- Add links to tutorials for ARVR and AnimationTree.
- Style fixes.
- Engine changes:
* Make `AnimationNodeTransition.input_<number>` properties internal
so that they don't appear in the docs. They still appear in the
inspector based on the actual number of inputs requested.
* Drop unimplemented `CPUParticles.flatness`. It's only used for 3D
particles in `ParticlesMaterial`, and thus only relevant for
`CPUParticles3D`.
Setters and getters have been hidden from the documentation when the matching
properties have been exposed, but some of them are parametric and require the
name or index of a given parameter to be used. So they need to be properly
documented with the type and name of the arguments they take.
For example, CPUParticles' `set_param(Parameter param, float value)`.
- Document a few more properties and methods
- Add more information to many classes
- Fix lots of typos and gramar mistakes
- Use [code] tags for parameters consistently
- Use [b] and [i] tags consistently
- Put "Warning:" and "Note:" on their own line to be more visible,
and make them always bold
- Tweak formatting in code examples to be more readable
- Use double quotes consistently
- Add more links to third-party technologies
Schlick's approximation and GGX are orthogonal concepts.
Furthermore, it's usage so far has been inconsistent: we don't even use it with anisotropic SchlickGGX, and Burley (Disney) diffuse does use it while its name doesn't indicate it.
The use of Schlick's approximation in Burley and GGX is an implementation detail and doesn't need to be reflected to the namig.
